FirePro W4190M vs GeForce MX250
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX250 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX250 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce MX250
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 693 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
190−200
medium / 768p
95−100
160−170
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 105% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
45−50
medium / 768p
12−14
30−33
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce MX250
Architecture
GCN
Pascal
Code name
Mars XTX?
N17S-G2
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
20 February 2019
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1582 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
24.91
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2
CUDA
6.1
Laptop size
medium sized
large
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price