GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce MX250
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX250. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX250. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 218 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 5300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX250 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Code name | GF104 | N17S-G2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 24.91 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |