GeForce MX250 vs GRID K140Q
When comparing GeForce MX250 and GRID K140Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID K140Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 1200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 668 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 5218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 218% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |