GeForce MX250 vs GRID M60 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX250 and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX250 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 961 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 38% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |