GeForce MX250 vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing GeForce MX250 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce MX250 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX250 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX250 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 468 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
35−40
4K / 2160p
4−5
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
85−90
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
90−95
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
75−80
140−150
medium / 768p
70−75
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX250.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
30−33
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce MX250.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce MX250.
Full Specs
GeForce MX250
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell
Code name
N17S-G2
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
20 February 2019
2 October 2015
Pipelines
384
1,024
Core clock speed
1518 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
24.91
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.1.126
CUDA
6.1
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price