GeForce MX250 vs Radeon E6760
When choosing between GeForce MX250 and Radeon E6760, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX250 and Radeon E6760.
Radeon E6760
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 918 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 3800 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |