GeForce MX250 vs Radeon E8860
When choosing between GeForce MX250 and Radeon E8860, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX250 and Radeon E8860.
Radeon E8860
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 270% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 943 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX250 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |