GeForce MX250 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce MX250 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 788 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
GeForce MX250 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G2 | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |