GeForce MX250 vs Radeon R7 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX250 and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX250 stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX250 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 618 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |