GeForce MX250 vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing GeForce MX250 and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 618 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 6996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G2 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GeForce MX250 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
- GeForce MX250 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce MX250 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M