GeForce MX250 vs Tesla M60
When choosing between GeForce MX250 and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX250 and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 2900% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 961 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 192% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 133% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 230% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 190% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce MX250. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G2 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |