FirePro S10000 vs GeForce MX330
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce MX330, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against GeForce MX330, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce MX330 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 7400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 706 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX330. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce MX330 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tahiti | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1594 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 38.26 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |