FirePro V4900 vs GeForce MX330
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and GeForce MX330 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX330 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce MX330
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX330 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX330 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 731 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
110−120
200−210
medium / 768p
90−95
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
90−95
ultra / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
90−95
medium / 1080p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 129% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
70−75
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
50−55
medium / 768p
10−11
30−35
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−105
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce MX330
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Pascal
Code name
Turks
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
20 February 2020
Pipelines
480
384
Core clock speed
800 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
38.26
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
