FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX330

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V7900 and GeForce MX330. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V7900 and GeForce MX330. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

GeForce MX330 Check Price

GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:

GeForce MX330 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	GeForce MX330
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	10 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 1410% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX330 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 and GeForce MX330 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 806 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 27% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	20−22	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V7900 and GeForce MX330 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	200−210
medium / 768p	150−160	170−180
ultra / 1080p	75−80	90−95
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	110−120	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	80−85	90−95
ultra / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	90−95
medium / 1080p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 15% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	80−85
medium / 768p	60−65	70−75
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−105	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	50−55
medium / 768p	24−27	30−35
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	100−105
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	GeForce MX330
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Pascal
Code name	Cayman	N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2011	20 February 2020
Pipelines	1280	384
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1531 MHz
Boost Clock		1594 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	38.26
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs GeForce MX330

GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares