FirePro W4190M vs GeForce MX330
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX330 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX330 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX330 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX330 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce MX330
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX330 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX330 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 706 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4190M and GeForce MX330 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
45−50
90−95
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
90−95
ultra / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 105% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−105
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce MX330
Architecture
GCN
Pascal
Code name
Mars XTX?
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
20 February 2020
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1594 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
38.26
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price