GeForce MX330 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX330 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX330 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce MX330 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce MX330 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
140−150
medium / 768p
170−180
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
55−60
QHD / 1440p
50−55
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
130−140
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
90−95
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
65−70
medium / 1080p
45−50
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 78% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
80−85
55−60
medium / 768p
70−75
50−55
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
27−30
medium / 768p
30−35
18−20
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−105
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
high / 768p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce MX330
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Pascal
Polaris
Code name
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
20 February 2020
21 March 2018
Pipelines
384
512
Core clock speed
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
38.26
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
