GeForce MX330 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing GeForce MX330 and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX330 and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 631 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 22.56 |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |