GeForce MX330 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 2370% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 957 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce MX330.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
GeForce MX330 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce MX330
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
20 February 2020
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
1531 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
38.26
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
