GeForce MX330 vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 498 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
GeForce MX330 and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX330 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |