GeForce MX330 vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 601 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 178% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 141% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 176% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 191% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 179% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce MX330. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX330 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |