FireStream 9250 vs GeForce MX350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce MX350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce MX350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 729 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 158% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX350 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
| Code name | RV770 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 20 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 29.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |