GeForce 920A vs GeForce MX350
When comparing GeForce 920A and GeForce MX350, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce MX350 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A has 65% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920A and GeForce MX350 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 4998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK208B | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |