GeForce 940A vs GeForce MX350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940A and GeForce MX350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940A stacks up against GeForce MX350, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 940A
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940A | GeForce MX350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 940A has 65% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 325 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 4998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940A and GeForce MX350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 131% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940A | GeForce MX350 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM108 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 29.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |