GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce MX350

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce MX350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

GeForce MX350 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce MX350 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce MX350 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or GeForce MX350 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

GeForce MX350 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	GeForce MX350
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	20 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 146 MHz higher, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	0−1	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	27−30
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	180−190
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−105
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	95−100
ultra / 1080p	0−1	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	0−1	55−60
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	GeForce MX350
Architecture	G9x	Pascal
Code name	N10E-GS1	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	20 February 2020
Pipelines	64	640
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1354 MHz
Boost Clock		1468 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	29.98
Floating-point performance	192 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed		7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	56.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Optimus		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce MX350

GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce MX350 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares