GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce MX350
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce MX350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce MX350.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1345% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 112 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 6001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce MX350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GT200B | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |