GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce MX350
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX350.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 175% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX350 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 726 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 2992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK106 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |