GeForce MX350 vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between GeForce MX350 and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX350 and GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 550% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 504 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 239% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 112% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |