GeForce MX350 vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX350 and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX350 stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1025% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 609 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce MX350 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |