GeForce MX350 vs GRID M6 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX350 and GRID M6 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX350 stacks up against GRID M6 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 632 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 11% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 69.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |