GeForce MX350 vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 225% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX350 and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 687 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 1988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |