GeForce MX350 vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 754 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 3800 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |