GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 5970
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Radeon HD 5970 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 5970 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 5970
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 1370% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 629 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX350 and Radeon HD 5970 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon HD 5970. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Hemlock |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |