GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 629 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 220% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce MX350 vs FirePro W5000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro M1000M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs FirePro W5000
- GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics