GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX350 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 454 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |