GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 560X
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 560X has 275% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 560X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 179 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 560X.
- GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX 560X are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX 560X is 7000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX 560X. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |