GeForce MX350 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX350 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1090% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 4000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |