GeForce MX350 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1090% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 4012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |