GeForce MX350 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 1135% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−105
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
30−33
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
30−33
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
GeForce MX350 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GeForce MX350
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
20 February 2020
25 July 2011
Pipelines
640
448
Core clock speed
1354 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
Transistor count
3,300 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
29.98
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
