FirePro W5100 vs GeForce MX450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W5100
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 465 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 4002 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Bonaire | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 10002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |