FireStream 9270 vs GeForce MX450
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX450, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against GeForce MX450, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 645 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 6402 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX450 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
Code name | RV770 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 100.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 10002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |