FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX450
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 570 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5402 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX450 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
Code name | Cypress | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 100.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 10002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |