GeForce 830A vs GeForce MX450
When choosing between GeForce 830A and GeForce MX450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 830A and GeForce MX450.
GeForce 830A
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 830A | GeForce MX450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX450 has 51% more power consumption, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce 830A and GeForce MX450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 313 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 8202 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 830A | GeForce MX450 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Code name | GM108 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 July 2014 | 1 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |