GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce MX450
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce MX450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce MX450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 372% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX450 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 99 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 8895 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce MX450 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GT200 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 100.8 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 10002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |