GeForce MX450 vs GRID K260Q

In this comparison between GeForce MX450 and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX450 will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce MX450 Check Price

GRID K260Q

GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:

GeForce MX450 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce MX450	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5,GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX450 and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5002 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	220−230	210−220
medium / 768p	190−200	180−190
ultra / 1080p	100−110	95−100
QHD / 1440p	70−75	50−55
4K / 2160p	35−40	30−33
high / 768p	150−160	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	20−22	16−18
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	110−120	95−100
medium / 1080p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	30−33	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−12	9−10
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	85−90	75−80
high / 1080p	35−40	30−33
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	10−12	9−10
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce MX450.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
medium / 768p	40−45	30−35
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce MX450.

Full Specs

	GeForce MX450	GRID K260Q
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GK104
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 August 2020	28 June 2013
Pipelines	896	1536
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	745 MHz
Boost Clock	1575 MHz
Transistor count	4,700 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	95.36
Floating-point performance		2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	3.0
Optimus	+
	Check Price

GeForce MX450 vs GRID K260Q

GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares