GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing GeForce MX450 and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX450 and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 495 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 194% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 22.56 |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |