GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R7 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX450 and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX450 stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 495 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 9002 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |