GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Sky 500
In this comparison between GeForce MX450 and Radeon Sky 500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX450 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Sky 500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Sky 500
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX450 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Radeon Sky 500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 445 MHz higher, than Radeon Sky 500.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Sky 500 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5202 MHz higher, than Radeon Sky 500.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX450 and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce MX450 and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX450 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 August 2020 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 950 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |