GeForce MX450 vs Tesla M6
When choosing between GeForce MX450 and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX450 and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 465 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 4990 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX450 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce MX450 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |