FirePro M4150 vs GRID K140Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and GRID K140Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID K140Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
GRID K140Q
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID K140Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |