FirePro W7170M vs GRID K140Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7170M and GRID K140Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID K140Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K140Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 30% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 127 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 345% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2350% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |